Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: new discussion draft

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz(at)emyr(dot)net>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: new discussion draft
Date: 2016-11-16 18:55:35
Message-ID: 103b56f9-1fc4-d3d5-9750-a3ceab69c1c2@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On 11/16/2016 10:38 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
> Jimmy,
>

> We've had the same bylaws for over a decade; I see no reason to rush
> into revising them. If there is some urgency, then please also let the
> membership know about that.

This wasn't rushed. This discussion has been going on for years and when
the board had to F2F last January (Feb?), we sat down with legal to fix
a lot of the oddities and bring the bylaws into a more reasonable state.

You may want to refer to the previous discussions on -general (months
ago) when the board released the first draft.

Sincerely,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh berkus 2016-11-16 19:03:25 Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence
Previous Message Josh berkus 2016-11-16 18:38:49 Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: new discussion draft