| From: | Joachim Breitner <mail(at)joachim-breitner(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for discussion: adding member projects? |
| Date: | 2004-11-01 00:39:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1099269596.9156.8.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Hi,
> What guidelines or even strict rules should we use in the acceptance or
> rejection of member project requests?
Just brainstorming:
* Projects should not be opposite competitors to current member
projects (e.g.: a redhat based distro - no, a debian basted distro that
cooperates with debian - yes)
* Project should have a focus that is more than just one package or
project (debian, gnome, gnustep, something-like-sourceforge - yes.
screen, wget, gnupg - no)
* Project having a certain significance in the Free Software world
Just thought that come to my mind, no opinion implicated (yet).
nomeata
--
Joachim Breitner
e-Mail: mail(at)joachim-breitner(dot)de
Homepage: http://www.joachim-breitner.de
ICQ#: 74513189
Bitte senden Sie mir keine Word- oder PowerPoint-Anhänge.
Siehe http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.de.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wichert Akkerman | 2004-11-01 08:56:31 | Re: Call for discussion: adding member projects? |
| Previous Message | David Graham - SPI Secretary | 2004-10-29 15:42:17 | Re: Resolution 2004-10-28.dbg.1: Treasurer's Budget |