From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> |
Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, neilm(at)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [Spi-private] Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity |
Date: | 2006-12-28 17:53:30 |
Message-ID: | 1167328410.24530.33.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
> I think this barrier contradicts the bylaws. They say the secretary
> shall "present to the membership at any meetings any communication
> addressed to the Secretary of the organization". Actually, why has the
> secretary not been reporting such communications at meetings?
Hmm.. good point. I guess the minutes could be considered such as beast
but that is after the fact.
> [...]
> > If the board will not consider a resolution, it may be put before the
> > membership for a vote. The proposer should submit the vote to the
> > secretary with N seconds. N is defined as:
> > N = sqrt(M) where M is the number of contributing members.
>
> This suggested amendment to the bylaws looks like another new barrier
> to member participation, designed to allow the board to ignore member
> requests completely, unless they're backed by 20 contributing members
> or 1 board member.
Yeah this is kind of awkward. I would agree that basically something
like 1 board member or 20 contributing members makes much more sense.
>
> Resolutions received by the Secretary more than 48 hours before a
> board meeting, or the issue of the meeting notice if later, will be
> put before the board for consideration. Resolutions received later
> may not be reported until the following meeting.
Honestly, I think 48 hours is a bit short. Make it a week.
>
> Please indicate if you feel the resolution request should be resent to
> spi-general, spi-private or only board, or send a copy yourself.
> Resolutions which have not been discussed much in advance may be
> considered with a recommendation to vote at a future meeting.
>
>
> and please prioritise improving member communications above building
> new barriers to participation.
I don't think he is trying to build barriers, I think he is trying to
define policy, which is completely different.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | MJ Ray | 2006-12-28 18:00:29 | Re: [Spi-private] Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity |
Previous Message | Michael Schultheiss | 2006-12-28 17:49:37 | Re: [Spi-private] Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity |