| From: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Wichert Akkerman <wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Board of directors membership election |
| Date: | 2003-10-29 18:27:20 |
| Message-ID: | 16288.1672.848512.571288@chiark.greenend.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-announce spi-general |
Wichert Akkerman writes ("Re: Board of directors membership election"):
> Previously Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > Treating such ballots as worthless seems overly pedantic to me.
>
> Fact remains that you have to with condorcet since it doesn't allow
> equal ranking of all the other options.
That's not true, or at least most people's deployment of Condorcet
_does_ allow equal ranking of all the other options. The most obvious
example is the Debian one. Why don't we just use the interpretation
of Condorcet specified nicely in the (newly-revised) Debian
Constitution ?
Ian.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Perens | 2003-10-29 18:49:41 | Re: Board of directors membership election |
| Previous Message | Anthony Towns | 2003-10-29 16:37:08 | Re: Board of directors membership election |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Perens | 2003-10-29 18:49:41 | Re: Board of directors membership election |
| Previous Message | Anthony Towns | 2003-10-29 16:37:08 | Re: Board of directors membership election |