From: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Call for votes for SPI board of directors membership election |
Date: | 2003-11-07 13:05:01 |
Message-ID: | 16299.39037.409032.621803@chiark.greenend.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-announce spi-general |
Wichert Akkerman writes ("Call for votes for SPI board of directors membership election"):
> As such, vote preferences should be made by ranking the candidates. A
> vote that simply specifies "X" is does not imply preference. [...]
I am very disappointed, Wichert, that despite detailed explanations,
and clear consensus to use a more sensible system, you haven't heeded
everyone's wishes.
I'm now wondering whether the Board should pass an emergency
resolution suspending the election and asking you to restart it with a
more sensible interpretation of ballots.
Ian.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wichert Akkerman | 2003-11-07 13:13:12 | Re: Call for votes for SPI board of directors membership election |
Previous Message | Wichert Akkerman | 2003-11-07 00:03:40 | Call for votes for SPI board of directors membership election |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wichert Akkerman | 2003-11-07 13:13:12 | Re: Call for votes for SPI board of directors membership election |
Previous Message | Wichert Akkerman | 2003-11-07 00:03:40 | Call for votes for SPI board of directors membership election |