From: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SPI's respect for debian resolutions, was: [GR] DD should be allowed to perform binary-only uploads |
Date: | 2007-02-15 15:02:01 |
Message-ID: | 17876.30185.600731.424059@chiark.greenend.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
MJ Ray writes ("SPI's respect for debian resolutions, was: [GR] DD should be allowed to perform binary-only uploads"):
> Given that SPI has a policy of not interfering in project decision-making,
> would the board please confirm at its forthcoming meeting that: SPI's
> current understanding is that the Debian Consitution defines who is
> authorised to act for the project and when; and SPI will recognise
> decisions taken according to the Debian Constitution?
As I said on debian-project(?) I obviously agree with those
statements.
If it would be helpful to Debian, I will draft a resolution in the
now-standard format describing our current understanding of our
relationship with Debian.
AJ, do you think that would be helpful ?
It wouldn't make the agenda for this Friday's board meeting.
> (This is a leading question as a result of the recent thread on
> debian-vote questioning whether SPI would respect a General Resolution.
> I would be happy for it to be considered in either the Correspondence
> Report or the debian questions item, rather than as a new item.)
I think SPI would respect a General Resolution.
Ian.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Jackson | 2007-02-15 15:18:12 | Re: Resolution 2007-02-15.jrk.1: Openness of Board Discussions |
Previous Message | Jimmy Kaplowitz | 2007-02-15 13:35:50 | Resolution 2007-02-15.jrk.1: Openness of Board Discussions |