Re: Meeting log for 2008-12-17

From: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Meeting log for 2008-12-17
Date: 2008-12-19 17:00:09
Message-ID: 18763.54041.474391.614398@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Meeting log for 2008-12-17"):
> On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 13:50 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > > [Ian Jackson:]
> > > > > > For other kinds of resolutions there are of course other isomorphic
> > > > > > problems. That is why THE MEMBERSHIP MUST BE GIVEN THE CHANCE TO
> > > > > > COMMENT!
> >
> > Any thoughts on that?
>
> I have no problem with the transparency.

I'm not sure whether you mean

(a) you feel that there was sufficient transparency in this case,
and therefore you are happy that the Privoxy resolution
was dealt with as it was, and would support such a process
in future;

or

(b) you agree with me that there should be more transparency
and feel that in future a different process with greater
transparency would be better.

or something else ?

Do you support Resolution 2007-01-16-iwj.5.html ?

Ian.

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Jackson 2008-12-19 17:03:58 Re: Meeting log for 2008-12-17
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-12-19 16:54:36 Re: Meeting log for 2008-12-17