| From: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> |
| Subject: | Re: Member communications II |
| Date: | 2008-12-22 17:28:30 |
| Message-ID: | 18767.52798.174924.599584@chiark.greenend.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Member communications II"):
> On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 09:24 +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> > > DRAFT RESOLUTION 2008-12-19.iwj.1
...
> With all due respect this seems like a motion for the sake of having a
> motion.
I would expect that if the Board passed that resolution we might not
see a repeat of the previous mistakes, where important decisions have
been made without any opportunity for anyone to comment ?
Or do you think you can assure us that we won't in any case see a
repeat of these problems ? And if so, on what basis ? After all
we've been `trying harder' for, well, years by now.
Ian.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-12-22 17:52:49 | Re: Member communications II |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-12-22 17:27:38 | Re: Member communications II |