| From: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> |
| Subject: | Re: Member communications II |
| Date: | 2008-12-22 18:14:00 |
| Message-ID: | 18767.55528.403228.420231@chiark.greenend.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Member communications II"):
> What is the problem we are trying to solve?
> The board's continual failures in communication and following protocol.
Right.
> How does this motion address the problem any more than the other motions
> that have already been passed?
It makes it clear that the Board is supposed to defer late business
rather than proceed with it - a matter which seems to have been
doubted. It also sets out what the basis might be for proceeding
anyway, the mechanism for making such a decision, and holds specific
officers responsible for enforcement.
But to be honest, I would be satisfied with a clear statement from the
Secretary and President that they will, henceforth, defer late
business.
If such a statement is not forthcoming then I would like the Board to
explicitly vote on my proposal, or something like it. At least then
next time it comes to elections we will know who to depose.
Ian.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joerg Jaspert | 2008-12-23 08:45:56 | Re: Meeting agenda robot |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-12-22 17:52:49 | Re: Member communications II |