From: | Richard Stallman <rms(at)gnu(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | ean(at)novare(dot)net |
Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)debian(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Apple and Open Source |
Date: | 1999-03-25 06:57:08 |
Message-ID: | 199903250657.XAA17934@wijiji.santafe.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
I think there are two issues here: the requirement to publish changes
and the requirement to notify a specific party.
The requirement to publish changes, even if the changes are not being
used by the public in any way, violates an essential privacy right.
The requirement to notify a specific party when you release a modified
version is perhaps not fatal, but I have a bad feeling about it.
The patent clauses are curious and I can see the danger in the fact that
Apple can keep you from ever getting a chance to fight a patent in court.
On the other hand, Apple has granted use of an unknown number of patents
for use in free software. This seems like a good thing.
These are two separate actions. The latter would be a good thing, not
a problem, of course, but the former is a problem.
(Though in fact they have not granted "use in free software" of these
patents, only use in this particular software, whose freeness or not
is the question here.)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joseph Carter | 1999-03-25 09:25:21 | Re: [part 2] Article 3: Membership |
Previous Message | Will Lowe | 1999-03-25 06:38:27 | Re: [part 2] Article 3: Membership |