Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification

From: bruce(at)perens(dot)com
To: bruce(at)perens(dot)com, knghtbrd(at)debian(dot)org
Cc: aj(at)azure(dot)humbug(dot)org(dot)au, chip(at)perlsupport(dot)com, debian-legal(at)lists(dot)debian(dot)org, owinebar(at)se232(dot)math(dot)indiana(dot)edu, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification
Date: 1999-04-03 06:53:27
Message-ID: 19990403065327.22749.qmail@perens.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd(at)debian(dot)org>
> One single person on the OSI board says they are doing this on one single
> mailing list. He agrees the export issue is a real issue and that the
> termination cause is undesirable. He has only acknowledged the export
> thing to actually be a problem with the OSD and says it was an honest
> mistake.

That's nice. Perhaps Eric Raymond should say it. Unfortunately, he seems to
be stuck responding to every criticism as if it was a personal challenge to
his authority and nothing more.

By the way, regarding "civility" - OSI was contacted before my open letter
was released. Russ Nelson's response was not entirely civil (unusual for him),
and I don't believe that any of the OSI members online at that time knew the
identity of the Apple contact, and Eric was offline as usual. I had to find
the contact's name out _through_the_press_. A day later Apple opened mailing
lists and apologized to me for the lack of a path for public feedback.

Thanks

Bruce

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message bruce 1999-04-03 07:02:04 Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification
Previous Message Anthony Towns 1999-04-03 06:45:58 Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification