From: | Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus(dot)Brinkmann(at)ruhr-uni-bochum(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Russell Nelson <nelson(at)crynwr(dot)com>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification |
Date: | 1999-04-11 10:28:36 |
Message-ID: | 19990411122836.A281@ruhr-uni-bochum.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
On Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 01:29:02AM -0000, Russell Nelson wrote:
>
> Right, and if they want to do so using Open Source(tm), they have to
> abide by the rules. And that means "free [their] software".
Yeah, that's one fundamental prerequisite. But that will not mean that we
"choose to play with them", to stretch the analogy.
There is a lot more behind it: for example, good faith and mind share. I
wonder if the members of the OSI board read the "reflections about the past
year" by Frank Hecker from Mozilla. http://www.mozilla.org/mozilla-at-one.html
(It seems thatat least ESR read it, judging by the "open letter to
Microsoft" [[on that I better not comment]])
The point is that the company must make a good effort to go Free Software,
or the bazaar model doesn't work because of lack of participiation.
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org finger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org master.debian.org
Marcus(dot)Brinkmann(at)ruhr-uni-bochum(dot)de for public PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Russell Nelson | 1999-04-11 12:15:51 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification |
Previous Message | Robert Levin | 1999-04-11 06:05:34 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Open Source certification |