Re: [DRAFT 2] Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES

In message <Pine(dot)LNX(dot)3(dot)96(dot)990414174337(dot)3310A-100000(at)rapscallion(dot)math(dot)indiana(dot)
ed
u>, Lynn Winebarger writes:
>On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Nils Lohner wrote:
>
>> [ Here is the second draft of the Committees section of the bylaws. I made
>> some of the suggested changes, and added the permanent committees which I
>> forgot in the last draft.
>>
>> Any other permanent committees that I forgot about? Any other comments?
>> Otherwise, I think it's about done... Anything else I may have left out?
>> If not, the voting section is next (oh joy!! :)
>>
> Just curious about how difficult it will be to add more permanent
>committees. I'm thinking that as the organization grows, some tasks
>left to the BOD will become too onerous for them to handle, but will be
>important enough to need a dedicated committee (budget work may fall in
>this category if the ball really get rolling in donations/supported
>projects). I think the two are fine to start with, as long as more can be
>added as they become needed.
>

I'm thinking permanent as in 'vital to the organization' as in SPI won't
be able to survive without them type of permanent. Other permanent ones
would need to be added to the bylaws, but I think that these are good
enough- if it becomes important enough we have to modify the bylaws, but
that by no means makes the others transitory. I think this is OK. I'll add
something to the next draft to define permanent a little better.

Nils.