Re: APSL 1.1

From: Raul Miller <rdm(at)test(dot)legislate(dot)com>
To: Chip Salzenberg <chip(at)perlsupport(dot)com>
Cc: debian-legal(at)lists(dot)debian(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)debian(dot)org
Subject: Re: APSL 1.1
Date: 1999-04-20 18:55:04
Message-ID: 19990420145504.S24636@rdm.legislate.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

> > [0] There is no distinction between bogus claims and
> > reasonable claims.
> > [2] There is no guarantee that a court will ever be involved
> > or that it will make a judgment.
> > [3] There is no guarantee that Apple will ever lift the
> > suspension.

Chip Salzenberg <chip(at)perlsupport(dot)com> wrote:
> This pretty much matches the real world. Again, all Apple is doing
> here is spelling out what would otherwise have to be fought over, at
> great expense of time, money, and PR.

Er.. can you point us at the relevant references?

I've not seen this in copyright law.

--
Raul

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darren O. Benham 1999-04-20 19:07:35 Mailinglist Archives (was Re: Subversive Dale?)
Previous Message Ben Pfaff 1999-04-20 18:28:05 Re: APSL 1.1