| From: | Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Final proposed Board resolution for Board elections voting system |
| Date: | 2017-03-08 22:43:22 |
| Message-ID: | 1f4df4c0-40c1-664a-874e-757466c671ea@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On 03/08/2017 02:27 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Josh berkus writes ("Re: Final proposed Board resolution for Board elections voting system"):
>>> 8. The practical implementation will be by means of software; for
>>> example, perhaps the openstv package in Debian. The choice of
>>> software is up to the Secretary. However, any differences between
>>> the Rules in the Order, and whatever software implementation is
>>> chosen, are to be resolved in favour of the Rules.
>>
>> What the heck does that last sentence mean?
>
> I don't understand how it's not clear.
>
> "The Rules in the Order" is a reference to the previous paragraph,
> which talks about "Rules 45-52 of the Scottish Local Government
> Elections Order 2007".
Suggested revision "the Rules in the Order referenced above" or ". I
wasn't the only one confused by this.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Jackson | 2017-03-08 23:20:24 | Re: Final proposed Board resolution for Board elections voting system |
| Previous Message | Josh berkus | 2017-03-08 22:41:14 | Re: Final proposed Board resolution for Board elections voting system |