Re: Proposed SPI Bylaws Amendment

From: Anthony Towns <aj(at)azure(dot)humbug(dot)org(dot)au>
To: spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed SPI Bylaws Amendment
Date: 2002-12-11 04:41:49
Message-ID: 20021211044149.GC3386@azure.humbug.org.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 05:01:18PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> How would you remedy this? The board can't remove people at meetings
> without a quorum, and the only provision for voting via email allows any
> board member to veto the resolution.

Eh? That's for the board to do email voting, not for the membership. The
By laws don't actually make it clear, but normally one expects board
members to be approved by the membership, not the board itself.

Cheers,
aj

--
Anthony Towns <aj(at)humbug(dot)org(dot)au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glenn McGrath 2002-12-11 05:13:48 Re: Proposed SPI Bylaws Amendment
Previous Message Peter Palfrader 2002-12-11 04:38:02 Re: Proposed SPI Bylaws Amendment