| From: | Anthony Towns <aj(at)azure(dot)humbug(dot)org(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ean Schuessler <ean(at)brainfood(dot)com> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-board(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Next board meeting |
| Date: | 2002-12-13 05:10:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20021213051006.GA7649@azure.humbug.org.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 04:29:54PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> > (6) Other issues still before the board
> > (eCos membership? Tax writeoffs/OFTC? United Way? Sincere
> > Choice?)
> Each of these issues constitutes a fairly significant conversation in
> and of itself.
If it were me (and it's not, and won't be), I'd have assigned each of
these to whoever has an interest in them, and had a report presented to
the board discussing any issues and giving a recommendation, and then
just having the report and recommendation accepted or not at the board
meeting. Board meetings aren't really places where you want to have
significant conversations; delegating, setting a deadline, and just
accepting or declining a report's recommendations is much more feasible.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj(at)humbug(dot)org(dot)au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Australian Linux Lovefest Heads West''
-- linux.conf.au, Perth W.A., 22nd-25th January 2003
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Cardenas | 2002-12-14 07:14:25 | Re: Proposed SPI Bylaws Amendment |
| Previous Message | Bruce Perens | 2002-12-13 04:15:03 | inactive board members? |