Previously Branden Robinson / SPI Treasurer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:11:05AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Seconded.
>
> Resolutions proposed for email voting don't need seconds. Would it be
> irregular to regard your message as a vote in favor?
>
> (Here's where Wichert and Joey fight over literal interpretations of the
> email voting policy, sigh.)
The resolution is quite clear and I'm afraid that Manoj's email indeed
can not be seen as a valid vote.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net> http://www.wiggy.net/
A random hacker