| From: | John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>, spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Next step -- Deciding on output |
| Date: | 2003-02-04 21:00:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20030204210057.GD6039@christoph.complete.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-bylaws |
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 03:09:39PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> call it a resolution exactly) produced by our committee. I think (3) is
> slightly different, and also belongs in the same document. Here is how I
> see the final document structure (rough idea):
>
> - Introduction
> - Purpose of Committee
> - Decisionmaking process
I don't think we need to have that in particular in there, but the purpose
of the committee would be good.
> That can all be one document. Thoughts?
I think that it is important that our proposed bylaws revisions be a
separate document, but otherwise it looks fine to me.
-- John
>
> - Jimmy Kaplowitz
> jimmy(at)debian(dot)org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Taral | 2003-02-04 22:29:15 | Re: Next step -- Deciding on output |
| Previous Message | John Goerzen | 2003-02-04 20:59:11 | Re: Next step -- Deciding on output |