Re: Timeframe?

From: David Graham <cdlu(at)pkl(dot)net>
To: John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org>
Cc: spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Timeframe?
Date: 2003-02-14 15:44:59
Message-ID: 20030214104437.E84832@spoon.pkl.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-bylaws

I'll have a list forthcoming this weekend.

=--------------------------------------------------=
David "cdlu" Graham cdlu(at)pkl(dot)net
Guelph, Ontario SMS: +1 519 760 1409

On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, John Goerzen wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We've seen two lists of problems with bylaws to date. I have a few
> questions for the other three people. These are questions only, and not
> criticisms, and "no" answers are acceptable.
>
> 1. Do you plan to submit a list of bylaws problems?
>
> 2. If so, how soon will you do so?
>
> What I am after is whether we can go ahead and move forth into the
> discussion phase, or if we are still waiting on additional input.
>
> As a reminder, debate is not on-topic quite yet.
>
> -- John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spi-bylaws mailing list
> Spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/spi-bylaws
>

Browse spi-bylaws by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2003-02-14 15:54:24 Re: Timeframe?
Previous Message John Goerzen 2003-02-14 15:44:36 Re: Next step -- Deciding on output