From: | Nick Phillips <nwp(at)nz(dot)lemon-computing(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Result for vote regarding new members for the board of directors |
Date: | 2003-02-23 20:38:22 |
Message-ID: | 20030223203822.GC2337@hoiho.nz.lemon-computing.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-announce spi-bylaws spi-general |
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 07:28:29AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> for that. Are you sure it doesn't mess up condorcet in such a way that
> it deadlocks/gives no valid result/whatever?
No, hence the last sentence in my previous mail: "...if there is a way of
accounting for this in a satisfactory manner when it comes to working out
the outcome."
But if it is a valid preference to express, and the voting system isn't able
to account for it, then the voting system is inadequate. This may be due to
a desire to "always have a clear outcome", which is IMHO not to be preferred
over "allowing the voters to fully and clearly express their preferences."
Cheers,
Nick
--
Nick Phillips -- nwp(at)lemon-computing(dot)com
Live in a world of your own, but always welcome visitors.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manoj Srivastava | 2003-02-24 03:00:43 | Re: Result for vote regarding new members for the board of directors |
Previous Message | John Goerzen | 2003-02-23 18:12:09 | Re: Result for vote regarding new members for the board of directors |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Graham | 2003-02-23 22:36:57 | Re: Updated issues list |
Previous Message | Taral | 2003-02-23 20:01:50 | Updated issues list |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manoj Srivastava | 2003-02-24 03:00:43 | Re: Result for vote regarding new members for the board of directors |
Previous Message | John Goerzen | 2003-02-23 18:12:09 | Re: Result for vote regarding new members for the board of directors |