From: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [Spi-private] IRC log from 2003-02-04 SPI Board meeting |
Date: | 2003-02-26 00:28:46 |
Message-ID: | 20030226002845.GA1054@blackbird.oase.mhn.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:54:36PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> If I'm going to write software, and donate my efforts and my
> intellectual property the Open Software community, that's my choice.
> I've done this on many occasions. But one thing that I will NOT do
> after making such a free donation of my efforts is to sign something
> which explicitly puts my house and all of my savings at risk. If IBM
> refused to put its corporate assets at risk when it donated the s390
> binutils changes to the FSF, why should I risk mine? As a result, I
> will refuse to donate code to any project which requires me to sign an
> agreement with similar language.
Fair enough. But on the other hand, I guess SPI has to decide whether
*it* wants to take up any risks and stand up for whatever code it
accepted. What happens if some company decides they have a patent on
something and tries to sue us into oblivion?
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sven Luther | 2003-02-26 09:02:06 | Re: [Spi-private] IRC log from 2003-02-04 SPI Board meeting |
Previous Message | Ean Schuessler | 2003-02-25 22:28:22 | Re: Status of purcel |