Re: #04: Electronic Meetings [CALL FOR VOTES]

From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org>
To: David Graham <cdlu(at)railfan(dot)ca>
Cc: spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: #04: Electronic Meetings [CALL FOR VOTES]
Date: 2003-06-27 19:50:52
Message-ID: 20030627195052.GC31596@wile.excelhustler.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-bylaws

On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:49:47PM -0400, David Graham wrote:
> While no longer numerically necessary, I do vote in favour with
> reservations.
>
> "Fair" is a highly interpretable term and may result in some debate or
> confusion in the future.

I agree. However, I was not prepared to support "ANY" method with no
qualifiers. I'm prepared to compromise and let them choose any fair method,
though.

At least this provides some mechanism for saying, "hey, letting only those
the agree with you vote isn't allowed" :-)

-- John

Browse spi-bylaws by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Goerzen 2003-06-27 19:57:16 #06: Public Resolutions [CALL FOR VOTES]
Previous Message John Goerzen 2003-06-27 19:49:32 #06: Public Resolutions