Re: SPI Workshop/Brainstorming Session at Debconf

From: Nick Phillips <nwp(at)nz(dot)lemon-computing(dot)com>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI Workshop/Brainstorming Session at Debconf
Date: 2003-07-24 10:09:37
Message-ID: 20030724100937.GB2390@hoiho.nz.lemon-computing.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 04:59:52PM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote:

> If we have a project that really uses our services and we are drawn into
> a legal action and the courts make a judgement against us then we better
> have Debian behind the decisions that drew us into court. Our
> disorganized accounting saying "this money is Debian's" is probably not
> going to diminish our liability. The board is almost all Debianers, the
> membership is mostly Debianers, so the court is probably going to decide
> that the responsibility (and the cost) belong to Debian. I'll run this
> by Chris Rourk to verify my thinking.

This is a very good point; perhaps some kind of trust administered by SPI
would be a better way to hold each project's money if there are at some
point a significant number of larger ones?

Cheers,

Nick
--
Nick Phillips -- nwp(at)lemon-computing(dot)com
Be security conscious -- National defense is at stake.

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Goerzen 2003-07-24 13:18:59 Re: SPI Workshop/Brainstorming Session at Debconf
Previous Message Ean Schuessler 2003-07-23 21:59:52 Re: SPI Workshop/Brainstorming Session at Debconf