Re: Resolution for a board membership election

David Graham wrote:
> > Continuity? I think that any more than about one third of the
> > board being replaced at any given time is likely to be disruptive.
> > At the discussion on #spi at the time of the meeting today, the
> > discussion meandered around to electing 3 board members every year;
> > with a total size of about 9 people, giving each board member a term
> > of 3 years.
>
> I don't personally believe that there is serious risk involved in having
> all board seats up for election annually, but I do know I am in the
> minority in this opinion thanks to the debates held on spi-bylaws.

Just FYI: In Germany this is the case usually with such associations
(such as ffis eV for example). The term can be discussed as 1-year,
2-year or whatever, though.

Regards,

Joey

--
If nothing changes, everything will remain the same. -- Barne's Law

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.