Re: Resolution 2004-10-16.dbg.1: Committee Framework

From: Martin Schulze <joey(at)infodrom(dot)org>
To: SPI Board of Directors <board(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolution 2004-10-16.dbg.1: Committee Framework
Date: 2004-10-17 07:46:44
Message-ID: 20041017074644.GG13859@finlandia.infodrom.north.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> BTW, our President already has the bylaws-given authority to appoint
> committees, so I don't know why we always bother with full resolutions
> for them. Or does that only extend to choosing the membership instead
> of the entire committee charter?

Even though it may not be required, I believe that it's good to
form committees through full resolutions, if only to demonstrate
the backing by the board.

Regards,

Joey

--
Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wichert Akkerman 2004-10-17 15:04:21 Re: making SPI's public mailing lists subscriber-posting-only
Previous Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2004-10-17 07:28:25 Re: Resolution 2004-10-16.dbg.1: Committee Framework