On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 08:43:17AM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Actually, I think that a pro-software-patenting organization would be in
> conflict with SPI's stated purpose for existence, which is to build,
> promote, and educate about Free Software. Software patents are the very
> best way I know of to promote Free Software.
I can't find anywhere on the website or in the by-laws where SPI's
purpose for existence is defined as being to "build, promote, and
educate about Free Software". Can you provide a cite?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(at)srcf(dot)ucam(dot)org