Re: [Spi-private] Re: Process problem with the election.

From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org>
To: Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>, board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Spi-private] Re: Process problem with the election.
Date: 2006-07-14 16:41:51
Message-ID: 20060714164151.GA7071@excelhustler.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:08:49PM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> I care a whole lot about SPI -- probably as much as you do. I also
> decided not to run this year because I thought that some new energy and
> the potential for more actively engaged board members would do the
> organization some good. You can read about my own decision not to run
> again this year here:
>
> http://mako.cc/copyrighteous/freesoftware/20060705-00.html

I'd like to second everything Mako said here. He wrote a very nice
piece there, that sums up some of the things I was thinking about also.
That article, plus time constraints I see coming up this fall, is
probably what convinced me not to run this year as well.

Mako, you've done a lot of good work for SPI, and I hope you'll be back
on the board someday.

-- John

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Perens 2006-07-14 16:44:32 Re: [Spi-private] Bruce's Platform
Previous Message Bruce Perens 2006-07-14 16:40:02 SPI board and the software patent issue