From: | John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> |
Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Changes to the mailinglist setup |
Date: | 2006-10-23 15:15:27 |
Message-ID: | 20061023151527.GC29593@excelhustler.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-bylaws spi-general |
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:36:05AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert <joerg(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
> > [...], reject with some rbl lists[3] [...]
> > [3] [bogusmx|dsn].rfc-ignorant.org, blackhole.securityusage.com,
> > sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, relays.ordb.org, opm.blitzed.org,
> > list.dsbl.org, ie. the more sane ones
>
> More sane perhaps, but still insane. Listing major European ISP
> outgoing mail relays still seems a frequent event on at least one of the
> "Real-time" Blackhole Lists. At least spamcop isn't being used. :-/
That doesn't mean they all are that way.
This looks like a very sane setup. Don't forget that it is far cheaper
resource-wise to drop them during the SMPT conversation rather than with
spamassassin later.
> RBLs should never trigger a reject, but can be good input to a scoring
I have been using the Spamhaus RBL for *years* and have yet to have had
a false positive with it.
And this on systems that process far more mail than SPI.
I think Joerg has built a very solid setup, and commend him on it.
-- John
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petter Reinholdtsen | 2006-10-24 09:01:19 | Re: Changes to the mailinglist setup |
Previous Message | Joerg Jaspert | 2006-10-23 11:05:15 | Re: Changes to the mailinglist setup |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petter Reinholdtsen | 2006-10-24 09:01:19 | Re: Changes to the mailinglist setup |
Previous Message | Joerg Jaspert | 2006-10-23 11:05:15 | Re: Changes to the mailinglist setup |