From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Cc: | Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> |
Subject: | Re: [Spi-private] Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity |
Date: | 2007-01-02 22:03:17 |
Message-ID: | 200701021403.18285.josh@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
Folks,
I'm in favor of this proposal in general, but would like to make sure the
language is absent potential minefields. In particular:
a) we need to preserve the board's ability to make "emergency" votes for
things involving external deadlines (like taxes and conferences) when they
can't be avoided. This is sometimes done by requiring two votes, one to
authorize the emergency vote and one to vote on it. Consider that we've
already proven that under NY law e-mail votes are impossible, so emergency
measures can't be taken outside of meetings.
b) I want to make it clear that this does not necessarily mean that the
*first* draft of new resolutions needs to go to -private or -general. I
know it's really helpful to me to have the board correct potential poor
choices of language before something goes to general discussion, so I'll
be planning on submitting second or third drafts to the larger lists.
--
--Josh Berkus
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Project Core Team
www.postgresql.org
(all opinions expressed are my own; I do not speak
for the Project unless specifically noted.)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | MJ Ray | 2007-01-03 13:07:33 | Re: [Spi-private] Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity |
Previous Message | Jimmy Kaplowitz | 2007-01-02 12:54:03 | Re: [Spi-private] Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity |