Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status

From: Anthony Towns <aj(at)azure(dot)humbug(dot)org(dot)au>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org, leader(at)debian(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Date: 2007-03-02 00:32:59
Message-ID: 20070302003259.GA15172@azure.humbug.org.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:17:33PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > 6. Debian will appoint a project representative to SPI, who shall
> > communicate decisions made by the project to the board, and serve
> > as a single point of contact for the board to communicate with
> > the project.
> I'm afraid that this fails to clarify precisely the situation that was
> being disputed. What if the representative fails to honour some
> Debian GR ?

Then that's something for Debian to resolve, up to and including
appointing a new project representative.

> Now obviously we expect them not to but the resolution
> should be written so that these cases are properly covered.

How is this any different to any other project having a representative
that doesn't pass on properly made decision?

Cheers,
aj

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Jackson 2007-03-05 12:59:38 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Previous Message Ian Jackson 2007-03-01 19:17:33 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status