Re: How does SPI differ from SFC?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: How does SPI differ from SFC?
Date: 2007-10-23 16:15:09
Message-ID: 20071023091509.20c93098@scratch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:12:50 +0100
MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> wrote:

> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > I spoke with the SFLC today. Although it is possible for you to be
> > associated with SPI and SLFC at the same time. It is not possible
> > for you to be associated with the SFC and SPI at the same time.
>
> Why not? Do SFC insist on holding all assets for a project, or is
> there some other reason not to co-operate?
>

It has to do with tax exemption. There is nothing stopping Madwifi from
"working with sfc" and "working with spi".

However, when you are "affiliated" with SPI, you are claiming our Tax
exempt status. There can only be "one" of those.

Joshua D. Drake

> Regards,

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-10-23 17:09:35 Re: Multiple Affiliations
Previous Message MJ Ray 2007-10-23 13:12:50 Re: How does SPI differ from SFC?