Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project [revised]

Hi Ian,

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:09:47PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I would suggest the wording below.

Great. I'll adopt it. I'm also going to add one more bit about deciding between
the two liaisons via what Gregers Petersen is calling an "odd case contact", in
case the two main liaisons disagree. This is as a result of discussing that
issue with him just now on IRC.

Revised Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1.iwj.1 (credit where credit is due):

WHEREAS

1. OpenWRT is a substantial and useful open source project.

2. OpenWRT would like SPI's support and assistance, including taking
donations.

THE SPI BOARD RESOLVES THAT

3. OpenWRT is formally invited to become an SPI
Associated Project, according to the SPI Framework for Associated
Projects, SPI Resolution 1998-11-16.iwj.1-amended-2004-08-10.iwj.1, a
copy of which can be found at
http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/2004-08-10-iwj.1

4. SPI recognises that OpenWRT is governed by the Charter available at
https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/NonProfit, as modified from time to time
via the processes in the Charter itself.

5. SPI understands that Andy Boyett and Gregers Petersen have been
appointed according to the Charter by OpenWRT as liaisons to SPI.

6. This invitation will lapse 60 days after it is approved by the SPI Board
unless each liaison, within that time, has accepted it on behalf of
OpenWRT, agreed with the other liaison on a single willing third person
who will be asked to resolve disagreeing instructions from the two
 liaisons, and communicated that choice to the Board.

7. The third person referred to in paragraph 6 may be replaced under the
same procedure as any other decision belonging to OpenWRT.

- Jimmy Kaplowitz
jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org