Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project

From: Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project
Date: 2009-03-18 18:22:24
Message-ID: 20090318182224.GG11317@kaplowitz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:51:44AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Given that SPI will just continue to add affiliates over time, I
> personally think that allowing *any* organization to have more than one
> authoritative liaison is a mistake. It doesn't scale for the number of
> projects SPI needs to support. I'm not a board member, I don't get a
> vote on this, but that's my opinion.

Can I ask what the reasons are that you've changed your opinion on this since
the July 6th, 2007 meeting when you did have a vote as a board member and voted
to approve OpenVAS with its three authoritative decisionmakers?

http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/meeting-minutes/2007/board-meeting-july-6th-2007.html/

- Jimmy Kaplowitz
jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MJ Ray 2009-03-19 11:05:45 Meeting log for 2009-03-18
Previous Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2009-03-18 18:18:43 Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project