| From: | Bill Allombert <ballombe(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, debian-project(at)lists(dot)debian(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project |
| Date: | 2013-12-14 20:09:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20131214200947.GB29751@yellowpig |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:32:59PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Nevertheless your opinion is interesting to me [...]
> >
> > [explanations]
>
> Thanks for that.
If you find clarification of the license that are grounded in the actual
text and written by B. Kuhn or the FSF, please forward them.
> > > > But it is probably not the right venue to discuss the AGPLv3.
> > >
> > > Perhaps not. But I don't want to use debian-legal whose focus is
> > > on DFSG compatibility and whose on-list consensus judgements don't
> > > always seem to align with the actual decisions of those responsible
> > > for these judgements within Debian.
> >
> > Why do you assume I do ?
>
> I'm sorry to have apparently offended you. I didn't intend to imply
> that you had suggested debian-legal. It seemed to me that
> debian-legal was an obvious possible place for this conversation and I
> was explaining why I chose not to use it.
Sorry, I just wanted to warn you that I was far from having the majority
opinion in Debian. (We need to fix debian-legal, but this is another
story.)
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe(at)debian(dot)org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Schultheiss | 2014-01-09 16:09:08 | Treasurer's Report as of 2013-09-30 |
| Previous Message | Ian Jackson | 2013-12-13 16:25:58 | Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project |