Robert Brockway writes ("SPI resolution 2014-03-20.rtb.1 - Chakra as an associated project"):
> The resolution below is submitted to the membership for discussion. I
> believe that Chakra fulfils the requirements for acceptance as an
> associated project.
I think that when an associated project is first mooted, the proposer
should tell us (the membership) some basic information, references,
etc.
I went to Wikipedia, and I assume that this is the Linux distro
("formerly based on Arch" says WP) rather than the proprietary
javascript interpreter.
http://chakraos.org/home/ AFAICT.
Thanks,
Ian.