Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)

From: Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz(at)emyr(dot)net>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)
Date: 2017-03-03 12:09:04
Message-ID: 22713.23776.54066.343776@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Luca Filipozzi writes ("Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)"):
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:18:06PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > [1] Personally I think the voting system should be entrenched in
> > the bylaws but I have given up trying to persuade people that the
> > Board election system should be defended against the Board.
>
> We discussed the awkwardness of the Board setting the rules for
> electing the Board, which is why I suggested during the recent Board
> meeting that we ask you to draft the resolution.

Interesting, thanks.

> Once the proposed revisions to the By-Laws pass, we can start talking about
> adding language regarding Board composition and/or Board voting algorithm.

Thanks for that encouragement. I'd like to help with that.

Ian.

--
Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barak A. Pearlmutter 2017-03-03 13:46:11 Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)
Previous Message Filipus Klutiero 2017-03-03 03:32:50 Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)