From: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz(at)emyr(dot)net> |
Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections) |
Date: | 2017-03-03 12:09:04 |
Message-ID: | 22713.23776.54066.343776@chiark.greenend.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
Luca Filipozzi writes ("Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections)"):
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:18:06PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > [1] Personally I think the voting system should be entrenched in
> > the bylaws but I have given up trying to persuade people that the
> > Board election system should be defended against the Board.
>
> We discussed the awkwardness of the Board setting the rules for
> electing the Board, which is why I suggested during the recent Board
> meeting that we ask you to draft the resolution.
Interesting, thanks.
> Once the proposed revisions to the By-Laws pass, we can start talking about
> adding language regarding Board composition and/or Board voting algorithm.
Thanks for that encouragement. I'd like to help with that.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barak A. Pearlmutter | 2017-03-03 13:46:11 | Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections) |
Previous Message | Filipus Klutiero | 2017-03-03 03:32:50 | Re: Voting system R&D (Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board elections) |