| From: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | MENGUAL Jean-Philippe <mengualjeanphi(at)free(dot)fr>, Chris Lamb <leader(at)debian(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>, debian-project(at)lists(dot)debian(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up |
| Date: | 2017-08-31 18:32:50 |
| Message-ID: | 22952.22098.25347.416091@chiark.greenend.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"):
> On 08/31/2017 07:19 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Debian would like to sign, jointly with SPI, a letter stating that we
> > do not intend to apply for EANs. A draft of the letter is below.
>
> The vendor should apply for their own EANs. If Debian/SPI applies for
> them it will provide a communication of validity to the vendor
> ("Official Debian Images").
>
> +1 for Debian not allowing an external vendor to appear as the official
> distributor (unless they actually are).
I'm not sure I follow everything you said there, but it sounds to me
like you are happy with my proposed letter. If I have misunderstood
then I'm afraid you'll have to clarify...
Regards,
Ian.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2017-08-31 18:53:06 | Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up |
| Previous Message | Ian Jackson | 2017-08-31 15:22:58 | Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up |