| From: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philippe Cloutier <chealer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Meeting agendas and mails to spi-announce mailing list |
| Date: | 2018-07-03 12:11:00 |
| Message-ID: | 23355.26580.191391.256395@chiark.greenend.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-announce spi-general |
Philippe Cloutier writes ("Re: Meeting agendas and mails to spi-announce mailing list"):
> If replies to mails sent to spi-announce are not supposed to be sent to
> spi-announce, I would suggest either:
It should be obvious that replies to mails sent to spi-announce should
hardly ever go to spi-announce. You do understand the purpose of an
announcements list ? It should have announcements, not discussions.
> 1. Setting the Reply-To to where they should go
I agree that people posting to -announce should usually set Reply-To.
> 2. Having the mailing list set Reply-To to where they should go
> 3. Indicating where replies should go in the list description
Neither of these is practical, because where the reply should go will
depend on what the announcement was and what the reply is.
Ian.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Michlmayr | 2018-07-04 13:38:21 | Re: Meeting agendas and mails to spi-announce mailing list |
| Previous Message | Philippe Cloutier | 2018-07-02 22:01:50 | Re: Meeting agendas and mails to spi-announce mailing list |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Michlmayr | 2018-07-04 13:38:21 | Re: Meeting agendas and mails to spi-announce mailing list |
| Previous Message | Philippe Cloutier | 2018-07-02 22:01:50 | Re: Meeting agendas and mails to spi-announce mailing list |