From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: money handling |
Date: | 2006-07-16 22:47:27 |
Message-ID: | 44BAC1FF.4060004@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
> So, where is this thing that makes BSD "more free" according to BSD
> fans? It's not in the license at all. It is in the policy that some
> projects have that says they will not accept non-BSD-licensed
> contributions, and that they will make source code available, and that
> they will not bind anyone else to do these things.
We are getting way off point here. As I said, I did not bring up BSD /
GPL for a licensing discussion. It was simply a illustration to show
fundamental differences in thinking about FOSS.
Differences which you are clearly pronouncing for me, thank you :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Thanks
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Perens | 2006-07-17 00:05:00 | common ground |
Previous Message | Bruce Perens | 2006-07-16 22:03:15 | Re: money handling |