Re: [Spi-private] Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity

From: MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Subject: Re: [Spi-private] Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity
Date: 2007-01-02 10:13:44
Message-ID: 459a3058.VwVpITNOTDo4h0qr%mjr@phonecoop.coop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> A deadline for proposals makes complete and perfect sense.

Why?

In other messages, I explain how other meetings send out their
business details before all member contributions have arrived.

> Procedure is not red tape when done from a productivity perspective. The
> more efficient the process, the more capable the process is.

I agree. Therefore, I don't understand why one would add dependencies
like 'all communications submitted' to the 'sending the agenda' task.
The board cannot control submissions, so it makes agenda publication
even less robust.

Hope that explains,
--
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble.

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2007-01-02 10:24:01 Re: [Spi-private] Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity
Previous Message MJ Ray 2007-01-02 10:03:48 Re: [Spi-private] Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity