Re: [Spi-private] Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity

Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org> wrote:
> I'm not going to address your main point above in this email, but the
> recent meeting announcements, including the 3-day advance notice for the
> December meeting, did have more than 0% information on the agenda. [...]

What's the point of posting the above? The previous post was
accurate: some recent months were 0%s - no announcement at all, for
various reasons, and the agendas were not linked from SPI's home page
or meetings page. That included November (configuration problem at
lists.spi-inc.org and notice too late to notice, correct and retry in
time AIUI) and some others in 2006.

December's http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-announce/2006/000140.html
"At time of writing, two motions have been raised, and there is one
set of minutes to approve." was indeed a little more than 0%. There
was a URL for the agenda, but agenda URL content used to get edited
right up to the meeting (not sure if that still happens).

Regards,
--
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble.