From: | MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> |
---|---|
To: | spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, board(at)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity |
Date: | 2007-01-16 19:13:54 |
Message-ID: | 45ad23f2.Mhya2nfK4vTDk+aF%mjr@phonecoop.coop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> Draft resolution 2007-01-16.iwj.1. This is pursuant to MJ Ray's
> "membership communication" item and should probably be treated as a
> proposed amendment to that part of MJ Ray's proposal:
> [...]
> 3. It is good practice to set a deadline for submission of new
> business, and to list the business to be conducted in meeting
> announcements.
It may be good to set a deadline for resolution proposals, but it
doesn't seem good practice to try to deadline new business.
> by T-5 days: Meeting reminder announcement, sent by email,
> containing complete list of non-emergency business to
> be conducted (NB, _containing_ not _linking to_).
Ow. So that's Thursday evening in the current model? I'd struggle to
reschedule if I don't know until then that something I want to oversee
is being discussed. Please, T-8 (Monday before) at latest.
> 6. For emergency agenda items, [...]
Agreed. A documented emergency item rule would be good.
Regards,
--
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Jackson | 2007-01-16 19:34:59 | Re: Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity |
Previous Message | Ian Jackson | 2007-01-16 19:06:45 | Re: Publically viewable resolutions and increasing the visibility of board activity |