From: | MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status |
Date: | 2007-03-06 00:01:00 |
Message-ID: | 45ecaf3c.YenrPorg0LNzZ4SH%mjr@phonecoop.coop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> The issue we're having with Debian is the requests by a couple of prominent
> (or at least vocal) Debian community members that we monitor, and react to,
> actions on debian-vote, as well as dealing with claims by Debian community
> members that the DPL was not authorized for some action and therefore the SPI
> board shouldn't listen to him.
The issue we're having between SPI and the Debian project is the claim
by a couple of SPI board members that SPI only recognises DPL
decisions and not any of the other project decision-makers. As far as
I can tell, there isn't anything on record disagreeing with that
goalpost-move, although there's nothing much to support it either.
(Confusing statements by the current DPL about his authoritativity
don't help, although he's also promised to relate faithfully any
non-DPL decisions, so that isn't critical ATM.)
Who is demanding that SPI monitors and/or reacts to debian-vote
directly? Personally, I don't care whether SPI monitors debian
directly (if there's a problem, SPI will probably hear about it, as
many DDs are SPI members). I do care whether SPI refuses to recognise
valid decisions just because they aren't DPL-supported.
SPI pledges to obey all OFTC decisions. Please do the same for the
debian project.
Now, those questions:
> (1) Does SPI listen only to the DPL, or to other Debian officers as well?
> Under what circumstances?
To DPL about funding authorisations and new delegates, Auditor about
information and Secretary about any other project decisions.
> (2) How does SPI determine that an officer has been replaced?
AIUI, it depends on how they're replaced: the DPL (delegations) or
Secretary (GR outcomes) would notify SPI as appropriate. This already
happens for the DPL election, doesn't it?
> (3) If a recall vote is underway, should SPI pay any attention to it? If so,
> in what way?
No.
> (4) If there is a dispute/disagreement on SPI lists between the DPL and other
> Debian members/officers, how should the SPI board regard it?
With sorrow and caution? Not sure what this is asking.
Hope that helps,
--
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Webmaster/web developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop maker,
developer of koha, debian, gobo, gnustep, various mail and web s/w.
Workers co-op @ Weston-super-Mare, Somerset http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anthony Towns | 2007-03-06 01:27:12 | Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-03-05 17:32:56 | Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status |