From: | Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com> |
Cc: | board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, treasurer(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Charters, manifestos, and SPI's purpose, and forum-widening |
Date: | 2007-05-14 20:00:43 |
Message-ID: | 4648BFEB.5090208@perens.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
Bruce Perens wrote:
> It costs a lot more to insure a number of people for their full net
> worth than it costs to insure a corporation that doesn't own anything.
> Insurance cost is at least somewhat proportional to the amount you are
> insuring. Covering the DDs as a group gets into the tens of Millions
> pretty quickly. Thus, shifting the burden of liability from the
> individual to the corporation is the essential first step in
> protecting that individual without breaking the bank.
>
OK folks - given the news from Microsoft today, it's time to do this.
Will SPI back it? Do I need a resolution? It will help me convince
Software Freedom Law Center to do the work if SPI backs it. It would be
a separate corporation from SPI for legal reasons - like we don't want
to put the Debian trademark in hock.
Thanks
Bruce
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josip Rodin | 2007-05-14 20:58:57 | Re: Charters, manifestos, and SPI's purpose, and forum-widening |
Previous Message | Josip Rodin | 2007-05-14 20:00:30 | Re: Charters, manifestos, and SPI's purpose, and forum-widening |