Re: Making the ballots secret

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

MJ Ray wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman <wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net> wrote:
>> Previously MJ Ray wrote:
>>> Wichert Akkerman <wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> No, a script is run post-vote that removes the relation between the vote
>>>> and the votee.
>>> So why can I see my past votes back to 2004?
>> I don't know. Maybe people haven't been running the script anymore.
>
> Can an SPI-admin run the script, please? (At least for 2004-6, which
> should be OK by everyone - surely no-one's would contest those now?)
>
>>> Still, can a webmaster of members.spi-inc see votes for current ballots?
>>> That doesn't seem secret.
>> A webmaster can't. The nm team and the SPI-admins can [...]
>
> Someone can check the votes, maybe including candidates. Not secret.
>
> Should board member elections be secret? (Not only because it looks
> required by Articles Five and Seven of the by-laws, but also.)
>
> If so, how will the election system change to run a secret ballot?

Votes are confidential, and they should be.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Thanks,

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGu0pWATb/zqfZUUQRAiD/AJ97dk1O5+ZoJ+4qjzqmC5X8oRrsyACeKhuC
TcV9bLbmWp93Cdqg4P0TWJM=
=fWig
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----