From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Renzmann <mrenzmann(at)madwifi(dot)org> |
Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How does SPI differ from SFC? |
Date: | 2007-09-25 15:55:14 |
Message-ID: | 46F92F62.6030707@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michael Renzmann wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> First off: I hope that I managed to choose the right platform for my
> inquiry ;) In case I failed, please accept my appologies in advance and
> let me know who I should contact instead. Thanks.
>
>
> I'm one of the guys behind the MadWifi project [1]. We intend to
> incorporate as a non-profit now. Joining a non-profit umbrella such as the
> SPI or the SFC (Software Freedom Conservancy [2]) for that purpose is very
> appealing for us; we are all technical guys and we're thankful for every
> administrative task that we don't need to take care of.
>
> As far as I could find out by now, it seems to me that SPI and SFC offer
> pretty similar services to its members. One difference I can see is the
> option to accept (tax-deductible?) donations through partners in Germany,
> Italy and Canada (on SPI's side), while SFC so far "only" has accounts in
> the US. Are there other important differences that I might have missed?
I won't argue against SFC as they are only trying to do what we are
trying to do, which is to help FOSS sofware projects. What I will due is
point out our particular strengths.
* SPI has been around a long time. We have taken our lumps and have
learned and are continuing to learn from them.
* We have an active board that is continually looking for ways to help
our affiliated projects.
* We have some of the largest and well known FOSS software projects in
the world as affiliated projects (Debian, PostgreSQL, OpenOffice.Org,
FreeDesktop.org).
* The board conducts all non-confidential business on our -private list
for our contributing members to see and participate.
Please feel free to ask any specific questions.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Director and SPI PostgreSQL Liaison
>
> What "unique selling point(s)" do you see for SPI in comparisson to the SFC?
>
> Bye, Mike
>
> [1] http://madwifi.org
> [2] http://conservancy.softwarefreedom.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spi-general mailing list
> Spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG+S9iATb/zqfZUUQRAjKtAKCVz4DPqLp7GFMMxO5B6dex50gXRwCZAY/2
ALf0bNiWfs1dZyM8+vq0kpo=
=CfMl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jimmy Kaplowitz | 2007-09-25 16:11:56 | Re: How does SPI differ from SFC? |
Previous Message | Michael Renzmann | 2007-09-25 14:44:38 | How does SPI differ from SFC? |