From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Renzmann <mrenzmann(at)madwifi(dot)org> |
Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> |
Subject: | Re: How does SPI differ from SFC? |
Date: | 2007-09-28 15:58:29 |
Message-ID: | 46FD24A5.8080306@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michael Renzmann wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> I'm not sure, but SFC's pumping of itself as a liability protection
>> makes it sound like they have taken out insurance, although I can't
>> find any details of it. On the other hand, they might just be
>> describing the nature of a corporation.
>
> Can you please explain the meaning of the above two sentences a bit more?
> I fear I fail to comprehend its meaning - please bear with me, I'm no
> native english speaker :)
A Corporation, by law provides a specific level of liability protection
to the share holders. This is where the term "Corporate Veil" comes
from. Basically the Corporation does something bad, the Corporation is
punished and not the share holders (there are exceptions but that is the
gist).
Secondarily, there is Corporate insurance. Often called Error and
Omission insurance. The purpose of this is just like Car insurance. If
you make a mistake, and blow away someone's database. They can sue you.
If you have insurance, the insurance pays. If you don't. The company
does. If the company doesn't... well that is badness.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Bye, Mike
> _______________________________________________
> Spi-general mailing list
> Spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG/SSlATb/zqfZUUQRAqw4AJsFO72ciW6VsyspS1zKmLf10gSLdgCgrZc5
74qstLkAUpB0u1eutMruFmk=
=IFse
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | MJ Ray | 2007-10-02 06:15:00 | Re: How does SPI differ from SFC? |
Previous Message | Bdale Garbee | 2007-09-28 06:50:10 | Re: How does SPI differ from SFC? |