From: | MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Election results |
Date: | 2007-08-07 13:57:46 |
Message-ID: | 46b87a5a.fIT7T+G1z9JoiDT8%mjr@phonecoop.coop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-announce spi-general |
Neil McGovern <neilm(at)spi-inc(dot)org> wrote:
> I've done a few others (Borda, Borda Elimination, Minmax, Nanson, Ranked
> Pairs, Condorcet (SPI), Condorcet (Debian), Bucklin, IRV, Pluralty) at
> http://blog.halon.org.uk/geek/spi/2007-election-results-calcs.html
> for those interested
Thanks. I only did the ones that were obvious/easy how to do
manually. Could you link the software you used, please?
> > > 95 votes were received.
> >
> > Finally, as I understand it, turn-out was 25% of voting members (not
> > the 25% of SPI members that some press reported). Why was turn-out so
> > low (at least, I think it's low for a vote-by-mail in this type of
> > organisation) and what steps will SPI be taking to increase it?
>
> A review of who is a contributing member will be underway shortly.
Does that mean you suspect the turn-out was low because there are too
many voters and SPI will try to remove/reclassify voting members to
improve the turn-out proportion?
Thanks,
--
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Experienced webmaster-developers for hire http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
Also: statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, workers co-op.
Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-07 15:11:26 | Re: Election results |
Previous Message | MJ Ray | 2007-08-07 13:51:24 | Re: Election results |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-07 15:11:26 | Re: Election results |
Previous Message | MJ Ray | 2007-08-07 13:51:24 | Re: Election results |