Re: are we being honest about legal resources?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Perens <bruce(at)perens(dot)com>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop>
Subject: Re: are we being honest about legal resources?
Date: 2008-03-12 16:44:11
Message-ID: 47D8085B.3040107@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Bruce,

> Ugh. I think the problem here is that SPI has any mission _other_ than
> serving Debian.

Ah, so all that stuff *you* helped write into the original SPI charter
about serving the greater OSS community was a bunch of BS, then? You
never meant it?

SPI is an independant organization, with, at last count, nine member
projects. SPI is not part of the Debian decision-making process, and I
think quite a few DDs would be extremely offended at the idea of the SPI
board or mailing lists presuming to make decisions for Debian. I know
*I* would be if SPI presumed to do the same for PostgreSQL.

--Josh

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Perens 2008-03-12 17:14:47 Re: are we being honest about legal resources?
Previous Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2008-03-12 16:42:01 Re: are we being honest about legal resources?